Child pages
  • Leadership and Governance - Administration (including Library and ITS)
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Issues and questions this subcommittee will entertain:

UAlbany is expected to demonstrate, with regard to Leadership and Governance:

  • a well-defined system of collegial governance including written policies outlining governance responsibilities of administration and faculty and readily available to the campus community;
  • written governing documents, such as a constitution, by-laws, enabling legislation, charter or other similar documents, that:
    • delineate the governance structure and provide for collegial governance, and the structure's composition, duties and responsibilities. In proprietary, corporate and similar types of institutions, a separate document may establish the duties and responsibilities of the governing body as well as the selection process;
    • assign authority and accountability for policy development and decision making, including a process for the involvement of appropriate institutional constituencies in policy development and decision making;
    • provide for the selection process for governing body members;
  • appropriate opportunity for student input regarding decisions that affect them;
  • a governing body capable of reflecting constituent and public interest and of an appropriate size to fulfill all its responsibilities, and which includes members with sufficient expertise to assure that the body's fiduciary responsibilities can be fulfilled;
  • a governing body not chaired by the chief executive officer;
  • a governing body that certifies to the Commission that the institution is in compliance with the eligibility requirements, accreditation standards and policies of the Commission; describes itself in identical terms to all its accrediting and regulatory agencies; communicates any changes in its accredited status; and agrees to disclose information required by the Commission to carry out its accrediting responsibilities, including levels of governing body compensation, if any;
  • a conflict of interest policy for the governing body (and fiduciary body members, if such a body exists), which addresses matters such as remuneration, contractual relationships, employment, family, financial or
    other interests that could pose conflicts of interest, and that assures that those interests are disclosed and that they do not interfere with the impartiality of governing body members or outweigh the greater duty to secure and ensure the academic and fiscal integrity of the institution;
  • a governing body that assists in generating resources needed to sustain and improve the institution;
  • a process for orienting new members and providing continuing updates for current members of the governing body on the institution's mission, organization, and academic programs and objectives;
  • a procedure in place for the periodic objective assessment of the governing body in meeting stated governing body objectives;
  • a chief executive officer, appointed by the governing board, with primary responsibility to the institution; and
  • periodic assessment of the effectiveness of institutional leadership and governance.

In the areas of Administration, UAlbany is expected to possess or demonstrate the following attributes or activities:

  • a chief executive whose primary responsibility is to lead the institution toward the achievement of its goals and with responsibility for administration of the institution;
  • a chief executive with the combination of academic background, professional training, and/or other qualities appropriate to an institution of higher education and the institution's mission;
  • administrative leaders with appropriate skills, degrees and training to carry out their responsibilities and functions;
  • qualified staffing appropriate to the goals, type, size, and complexity of the institution;
  • adequate information and decision-making systems to support the work of administrative leaders;
  • clear documentation of the lines of organization and authority; and
  • periodic assessment of the effectiveness of administrative structures and

*Evidence of Integrity should be interwoven in with the above discussions. MSCHE's overall interest in institutional integrity is that:

Integrity is a central, indispensable and defining hallmark of effective higher education institutions, and it can manifest itself through the institution's conduct within each of the other standards.

Volunteer to Join a Subcommittee

Please click to volunteer for this or any other subcommittee. In your e-mail please indicate two or three subcommittees on which you might be willing to serve, as well as your preference regarding first, second and third choice.

As related to these Middle States standards:

Standard 4: Leadership and Governance

The institution's system of governance clearly defines the roles of institutional constituencies in policy development and decision-making. The governance structure includes an active governing body with sufficient autonomy to assure institutional integrity and to fulfill its responsibilities of policy and resource development, consistent with the mission of the institution.

Standard 5: Administration

The institution's administrative structure and services facilitate learning and research/scholarship, foster quality improvement, and support the institution's organization and governance.

Standard 6: Integrity

In the conduct of its programs and activities involving the public and the constituencies it serves, the institution demonstrates adherence to ethical standards and its own stated policies, providing support for academic and intellectual freedom.

Search this Wiki Space

Recently Updated

  • No labels